We respect knowledge and science. Our activities are based on information acquired through scientific methods. The objective of Metropolia's research, development, and innovation activities (RDI) is to develop essentially new knowledge, activities, and competence for resolving the challenges of our time and the society. We will act in accordance with the principles of responsible RDI activities, combining RDI with learning under the RDIL principle.
Ethical Principles of Research
We comply with the general ethical principles applicable to scientists, which include, among other things, respecting the human dignity, privacy, self-determination, and other rights of the subject and the material and immaterial cultural heritage and diversity of nature. Additionally, we will comply with the ethical guidelines and practices specific to our scientific field. A researcher must always conduct their research such that it does not cause significant risk, damage, or harm to the subjects.
Responsible Conduct of Research
We comply with the guidelines and recommendations regarding the responsible conduct of research drawn up by the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity (TENK). Each scientist is responsible for observing the responsible conduct of research. The basic principles of responsible conduct of research include reliability, honesty, appreciation, and responsibility.
Transparent RDIL Activities
Transparency is the core value of RDIL activities. This is why we promote a transparent operating culture. Transparency allows us to ensure that research results, the resulting data, research methods, and research infrastructures created with public funding are made available to the various operators of our society. Transparency is also a matter of equality – everyone should have access to researched information, and the information should be easily available.
Evaluation of a Responsible Scientist and Research
In our university community, researchers and research are evaluated using four general principles: transparency, integrity, equality, and the competence of the evaluators. Transparency of the evaluation process is an important element of the transparency of research. Each person is responsible for the prevention, identification, and elimination of scientific dishonesty.
How should I act?
General instructions
I will comply with the responsible conduct of research. I am familiar with Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) guidelines and recommendations of the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK and comply with them.
I am familiar with Metropolia's principles of responsible RDI.
Personnel
I am familiar with and understand the ethical principles that guide research and apply them in my research and project work, teaching, and other specialist duties.
I will comply with the principles of openness in science and research in my RDI activities.
I am familiar with the checklist for research data management in Oma intranet.
Students
I am personally responsible for the ethicality of my research (theses, innovation projects) and ensure responsible data management.
I will familiarize myself with the Ethical recommendations for thesis writing at universities of applied sciences in Arene webpage and checklist for students.
Partners
I will comply with these ethical principles and other principles agreed jointly with Metropolia in the context of RDI cooperation.